linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] blk-mq: Pass driver tags to blk_mq_clear_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c957c544-4040-e462-47f6-3514ab3da617@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 08:32:20 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
CC:     <axboe@...nel.dk>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>, <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] blk-mq: Pass driver tags to
 blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping()

On 19/08/2021 01:39, Ming Lei wrote:
>> That's intentional, as we have from later patch:
>>
>> void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>> unsigned int hctx_idx)
>> {
>> 	struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags;
>> 	struct page *page;
>>
>> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set->flags))
>> +		drv_tags = set->shared_sbitmap_tags;
>> +	else
>> 		drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
>>
>> 	...
>>
>> 	blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(drv_tags, tags);
>>
>> }
>>
>> And it's just nice to not re-indent later.
> But this way is weird, and I don't think checkpatch.pl is happy with
> it.

There is the idea to try to not remove/change code earlier in a series - 
I am taking it to an extreme! I can stop.

On another related topic, how about this change also:

---8<---
void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags,
			     struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
  {

+	/* There is no need to clear a driver tags own mapping */
+	if (drv_tags == tags)
+		return;
--->8---

Thanks,
John