linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] erofs: introduce chunk-based file on-disk format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YR2s7Gj7RDl7TaVn@B-P7TQMD6M-0146.local>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 08:59:24 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peng Tao <tao.peng@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Eryu Guan <eguan@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Liu Jiang <gerry@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] erofs: introduce chunk-based file on-disk format

Hi Bo,

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 06:28:04AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 03:07:12PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:

...

> > +	EROFS_INODE_CHUNK_BASED			= 4,
> >  	EROFS_INODE_DATALAYOUT_MAX
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -90,6 +96,19 @@ static inline bool erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(unsigned int datamode)
> >  #define EROFS_I_ALL	\
> >  	((1 << (EROFS_I_DATALAYOUT_BIT + EROFS_I_DATALAYOUT_BITS)) - 1)
> >  
> > +/* indicate chunk blkbits, thus `chunksize = blocksize << chunk blkbits' */
> 
> A typo in the quotation marks.  (`chunksize = ) should be ('chunksize =)

Such usage is like below:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0e389028ad75412ff624b304913bba14f8d46ec4
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=78128fabd022240852859c0b253972147593690b
I'm fine in either way. I'll update it in the next version or when
submitting.

> 
> Otherwise it looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>

Thanks for the review!

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> thanks,
> liubo
>