[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210819001310.GA535269@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:13:10 +0000
From: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
CC: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/hwpoison: Retry with shake_page() for unhandlable
pages
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:07:43AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:37 PM Naoya Horiguchi
> <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> >
> > HWPoisonHandlable() sometimes returns false for typical user pages
> > due to races with average memory events like transfers over LRU lists.
> > This causes failures in hwpoison handling.
> >
> > There's retry code for such a case but does not work because the retry
> > loop reaches the retry limit too quickly before the page settles down to
> > handlable state. Let get_any_page() call shake_page() to fix it.
> >
> > Fixes: 25182f05ffed ("mm,hwpoison: fix race with hugetlb page allocation")
> > Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.13
> > ---
> > mm/memory-failure.c | 11 ++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git v5.14-rc6/mm/memory-failure.c v5.14-rc6_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
> > index eefd823deb67..aa6592540f17 100644
> > --- v5.14-rc6/mm/memory-failure.c
> > +++ v5.14-rc6_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
> > @@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page)
> > * unexpected races caused by taking a page refcount.
> > */
> > if (!HWPoisonHandlable(head))
> > - return 0;
> > + return -EBUSY;
> >
> > if (PageTransHuge(head)) {
> > /*
> > @@ -1199,9 +1199,14 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
> > }
> > goto out;
> > } else if (ret == -EBUSY) {
> > - /* We raced with freeing huge page to buddy, retry. */
> > - if (pass++ < 3)
> > + /*
> > + * We raced with (possibly temporary) unhandlable
> > + * page, retry.
> > + */
> > + if (pass++ < 3) {
> > + shake_page(p, 1);
> > goto try_again;
> > + }
>
> I think the return value should be set to -EIO before jumping to out.
> I'm supposed -EIO means this is really or very likely an unhandlable
> page.
You're right, I have the same assumption that -EBUSY means transient error
and -EIO means permanent one. And we consider an error as permanent when the
retry limit is reached. I'll update the patch. Thank you for the comment.
- Naoya Horiguchi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists