lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210819012108.3isqi4t6rmd5fd5x@kari-VirtualBox>
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 04:21:08 +0300
From:   Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
        "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@...nel.org>,
        Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/20] ntfs: Undeprecate iocharset= mount option

On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 06:24:38PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Other fs drivers are using iocharset= mount option for specifying charset.
> So mark iocharset= mount option as preferred and deprecate nls= mount
> option.
 
One idea is also make this change to fs/fc_parser.c and then when we
want we can drop support from all filesystem same time. This way we
can get more deprecated code off the fs drivers. Draw back is that
then every filesstem has this deprecated nls= option if it support
iocharsets option. But that should imo be ok.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ