[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d0d6290-8341-56d8-7902-5a8c36bc7bb5@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 18:21:44 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] riscv: microchip: mpfs: drop duplicated nodes
On 19/08/2021 17:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The DTSI file defines soc node and address/size cells, so there is no
> point in duplicating it in DTS file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
Now I wonder whether the subject prefix should be "riscv: dts:
microchip:" instead?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists