linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add RK3399 Gru gpio-line-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:16:23 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add RK3399 Gru gpio-line-names

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:05 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> I guess one minor nit (now that I look back on the veyron patch where
> I mentioned it explicitly in the commit message) is that on the veyron
> ones we sorted this down at the bottom with the other pinctrl stuff
> instead of sorting it alphabetically with everything else. I'll let
> Heiko say which he likes better.

Huh, didn't notice that semi-convention. I can sort it however Heiko prefers.

> I also notice for veyron that we had a second "ABI" exception for the
> recovery mode pin, but I believe that goes through a different
> mechanism now so we're good there.

I believe the recovery mode pin is dropped from recent designs (don't
quote me in general on that), and there's a different mechanism used
just to get the at-boot-time "recovery mode" state directly from the
firmware.

> Even though I didn't do a line-by-line review, I'll still give:
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> ...though it's possible an "Acked-by" would be more in the spirit of
> that? Not sure...

Thanks!

Brian