| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1629445840-25510-1-git-send-email-sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:50:40 +0800
From: <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
To: <sam.shih@...iatek.com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<mpm@...enic.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
<linux@...ck-us.net>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
<enric.balletbo@...labora.com>, <fparent@...libre.com>,
<seiya.wang@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<john@...ozen.org>, <Ryder.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v2,06/12] pinctrl: mediatek: add support for MT7986 SoC
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
>This commit includes pinctrl driver for Mediatek MT7986
>
>The difference of pinctrl between mt7986a and mt7986b
>is that pin-41 to pin-65 do not exist on mt7986b
>
>Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>
>
>---
>v2: applied the comment suggested by reviewers:
> - for the pins not ballout, we can fill .name in struct mtk_pin_desc
> as NULL and return -ENOTSUPP in gpio/pinconf ops.
>
>---
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c | 1217 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 1225 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig
>index 7040a7a7bd5d..66db4ac5d169 100644
>--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig
>+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig
>@@ -119,6 +119,13 @@ config PINCTRL_MT7622
> default ARM64 && ARCH_MEDIATEK
> select PINCTRL_MTK_MOORE
>
>+config PINCTRL_MT7986
>+ bool "Mediatek MT7986 pin control"
>+ depends on OF
>+ depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>+ default ARM64 && ARCH_MEDIATEK
>+ select PINCTRL_MTK_MOORE
>+
> config PINCTRL_MT8167
> bool "Mediatek MT8167 pin control"
> depends on OF
>diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Makefile
>index 1bb7f9c65bc2..1e3931d924e7 100644
>--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Makefile
>+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Makefile
>@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT6797) += pinctrl-mt6797.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT7622) += pinctrl-mt7622.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT7623) += pinctrl-mt7623.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT7629) += pinctrl-mt7629.o
>+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT7986) += pinctrl-mt7986.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT8167) += pinctrl-mt8167.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT8173) += pinctrl-mt8173.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MT8183) += pinctrl-mt8183.o
>diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c
>new file mode 100644
>index 000000000000..808ae4e03eb2
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c
>@@ -0,0 +1,1217 @@
>+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>+/*
>+ * The MT7986 driver based on Linux generic pinctrl binding.
>+ *
>+ * Copyright (C) 2021 MediaTek Inc.
>+ * Author: Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>
>+ */
>+
>+#include "pinctrl-moore.h"
>+
>+#define MT7986_PIN(_number, _name) MTK_PIN(_number, _name, 0, _number, DRV_GRP4)
>+#define MT7986_NOT_BALLOUT_PIN(_number) { .number = _number }
I preferred explict set .name to NULL to indicate the pin is not ball out.
>+
>+#define PIN_FIELD_BASE(_s_pin, _e_pin, _i_base, _s_addr, _x_addrs, _s_bit, \
>+ _x_bits) \
>+ PIN_FIELD_CALC(_s_pin, _e_pin, _i_base, _s_addr, _x_addrs, _s_bit, \
>+ _x_bits, 32, 0)
>+
>+/**
>+ * enum - Locking variants of the iocfg bases
>+ *
>+ * MT7986 have multiple bases to program pin configuration listed as the below:
>+ * iocfg_rt:0x11c30000, iocfg_rb:0x11c40000, iocfg_lt:0x11e20000,
>+ * iocfg_lb:0x11e30000, iocfg_tr:0x11f00000, iocfg_tl:0x11f10000,
>+ * _i_based could be used to indicate what base the pin should be mapped into.
>+ *
>+ * Each iocfg register base control different group of pads on the SoC
>+ *
>+ *
>+ * chip carrier
>+ *
>+ * A B C D E F G H
>+ * +------------------------+
>+ * 8 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * 7 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * 6 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * 5 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * 4 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * 3 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * 2 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * 1 | o o o o o o o o |
>+ * +------------------------+
>+ *
>+ * inside Chip carrier
>+ *
>+ * A B C D E F G H
>+ * +------------------------+
>+ * 8 | |
>+ * 7 | TL TR |
>+ * 6 | +---------+ |
>+ * 5 | LT | | RT |
>+ * 4 | | | |
>+ * 3 | LB | | RB |
>+ * 2 | +---------+ |
>+ * 1 | |
>+ * +------------------------+
>+ *
>+ */
>+
>+enum {
>+ GPIO_BASE,
>+ IOCFG_RT_BASE,
>+ IOCFG_RB_BASE,
>+ IOCFG_LT_BASE,
>+ IOCFG_LB_BASE,
>+ IOCFG_TR_BASE,
>+ IOCFG_TL_BASE,
>+};
>+
>+static const char *const mt7986_pinctrl_register_base_names[] = {
>+ "gpio_base", "iocfg_rt_base", "iocfg_rb_base", "iocfg_lt_base",
>+ "iocfg_lb_base", "iocfg_tr_base", "iocfg_tl_base",
>+};
>+
>+static const struct mtk_pin_field_calc mt7986_pin_mode_range[] = {
>+ PIN_FIELD(0, 40, 0x300, 0x10, 0, 4),
>+ PIN_FIELD(41, 65, 0x350, 0x10, 4, 4),
>+ PIN_FIELD(66, 68, 0x380, 0x10, 8, 4),
>+ PIN_FIELD(69, 100, 0x380, 0x10, 20, 4),
>+};
>+
>+static const struct mtk_pin_field_calc mt7986_pin_dir_range[] = {
>+ PIN_FIELD(0, 40, 0x0, 0x10, 0, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(41, 65, 0x10, 0x10, 9, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(66, 68, 0x20, 0x10, 2, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(69, 100, 0x20, 0x10, 5, 1),
>+};
>+
>+static const struct mtk_pin_field_calc mt7986_pin_di_range[] = {
>+ PIN_FIELD(0, 40, 0x200, 0x10, 0, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(41, 65, 0x210, 0x10, 9, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(66, 68, 0x220, 0x10, 2, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(69, 100, 0x220, 0x10, 5, 1),
>+};
>+
>+static const struct mtk_pin_field_calc mt7986_pin_do_range[] = {
>+ PIN_FIELD(0, 40, 0x100, 0x10, 0, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(41, 65, 0x110, 0x10, 9, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(66, 68, 0x120, 0x10, 2, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD(69, 100, 0x120, 0x10, 5, 1),
>+};
>+
>+static const struct mtk_pin_field_calc mt7986_pin_ies_range[] = {
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(0, 0, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 17, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(1, 1, IOCFG_LT_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 10, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(2, 2, IOCFG_LT_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 11, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(3, 3, IOCFG_LB_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 0, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(4, 4, IOCFG_LB_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 1, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(5, 5, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 0, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(6, 6, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 1, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(7, 7, IOCFG_LT_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 0, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(8, 8, IOCFG_LT_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 1, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(9, 9, IOCFG_LT_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 2, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(10, 10, IOCFG_LT_BASE, 0x20, 0x10, 3, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(11, 11, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 8, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(12, 12, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 9, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(13, 13, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 10, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(14, 14, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 11, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(15, 15, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 2, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(16, 16, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 3, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(17, 17, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 4, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(18, 18, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 5, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(19, 19, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 6, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(20, 20, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 7, 1),
Actually, we can merge the consecutive entries into one to reduce the table size
For example, we can merge those entries pin 15 ~ 20 into one, from
PIN_FIELD_BASE(15, 15, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 2, 1),
PIN_FIELD_BASE(16, 16, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 3, 1),
PIN_FIELD_BASE(17, 17, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 4, 1),
PIN_FIELD_BASE(18, 18, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 5, 1),
PIN_FIELD_BASE(19, 19, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 6, 1),
PIN_FIELD_BASE(20, 20, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 7, 1),
to
PIN_FIELD_BASE(15, 20, IOCFG_RB_BASE, 0x40, 0x10, 2, 1).
Also please consider merging all the similar occurrences elsewhere to optimize them.
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(21, 21, IOCFG_RT_BASE, 0x30, 0x10, 12, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(22, 22, IOCFG_RT_BASE, 0x30, 0x10, 13, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(23, 23, IOCFG_RT_BASE, 0x30, 0x10, 14, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(24, 24, IOCFG_RT_BASE, 0x30, 0x10, 18, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(25, 25, IOCFG_RT_BASE, 0x30, 0x10, 17, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(26, 26, IOCFG_RT_BASE, 0x30, 0x10, 15, 1),
>+ PIN_FIELD_BASE(27, 27, IOCFG_RT_BASE, 0x30, 0x10, 16, 1),
<snip>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists