[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <162945752305.2126143.7959914980998500483.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:05:44 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/2] Fix off-by-one in range_is_memory
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:32:30 +0000, David Brazdil wrote:
> the range_is_memory function in hyp.
>
> David Brazdil (2):
> KVM: arm64: Fix off-by-one in range_is_memory
> KVM: arm64: Minor optimization of range_is_memory
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied to kvm-arm64/mmu/el2-tracking, thanks!
[2/2] KVM: arm64: Minor optimization of range_is_memory
commit: 14ecf075fe5be01860927fdf3aa11d7b18023ab2
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists