lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMzqmN1dYpbYSCXWN9VwHn8+MXj3P=G09qD6=atwrcJ8WA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:17:42 +0200
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Subject: Question on commit dc7109aaa233 ("futex: Validate waiter correctly in futex_proxy_trylock_atomic()")

Dear Thomas,

in commit dc7109aaa233 ("futex: Validate waiter correctly in
futex_proxy_trylock_atomic()") visible on next-20210819, you add:

+    /*
+     * Ensure that this is a waiter sitting in futex_wait_requeue_pi()
+     * and waiting on the 'waitqueue' futex which is always !PI.
+     */
+    if (!top_waiter->rt_waiter || top_waiter->pi_state)
+        ret = -EINVAL;

However, ret is unconditionally reassigned later and erases any
intended effect of this assignment. This is making that assignment
above a Dead Store, which clang-analyzer correctly warns about and
which motivates me to write you an email.

Did you intend to return -EINVAL here? So:

+       if (!top_waiter->rt_waiter || top_waiter->pi_state)
+               return -EINVAL;



Best regards,

Lukas

Static analysis tools are as foolish as they are... but every dog has its day...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ