[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2108201420570.15313@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:21:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
cc: benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-hidpp: Use 'atomic_inc_return' instead of
hand-writing it
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> This function logs a warning if the workqueue gets too big.
> In order to save a few cycles, use 'atomic_inc_return()' instead of an
> 'atomic_inc()/atomic_read()' sequence.
>
> This axes a line of code and saves a 'atomic_read()' call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> index 61635e629469..a7fa35245c2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> @@ -2240,11 +2240,10 @@ static int hidpp_ff_queue_work(struct hidpp_ff_private_data *data, int effect_id
> wd->size = size;
> memcpy(wd->params, params, size);
>
> - atomic_inc(&data->workqueue_size);
> + s = atomic_inc_return(&data->workqueue_size);
> queue_work(data->wq, &wd->work);
>
> /* warn about excessive queue size */
> - s = atomic_read(&data->workqueue_size);
> if (s >= 20 && s % 20 == 0)
> hid_warn(data->hidpp->hid_dev, "Force feedback command queue contains %d commands, causing substantial delays!", s);
Applied, thank you.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists