[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d733d47bc6a86fe28302943e50d02bd5@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 19:54:02 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mka@...omium.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, agross@...nel.org,
ohad@...ery.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dianders@...omium.org, rishabhb@...eaurora.org,
sidgup@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/13] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add QMP
property
On 2021-08-20 00:25, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sibi Sankar (2021-08-18 20:02:05)
>> The load state power-domain, used by the co-processors to notify the
>> Always on Subsystem (AOSS) that a particular co-processor is up/down,
>> suffers from the side-effect of changing states during suspend/resume.
>> However the co-processors enter low-power modes independent to that of
>> the application processor and their states are expected to remain
>> unaltered across system suspend/resume cycles. To achieve this
>> behavior
>> let's drop the load state power-domain and replace them with the qmp
>> property for all SoCs supporting low power mode signalling.
>>
>
> How do we drop the load state property without breaking existing DTBs?
> Maybe we need to leave it there and then somehow make it optional? Or
> do
> we not care about this problem as the driver will start ignoring it?
We can afford to break the bindings
because of the following reason:
* Load state in mainline is currently
broken i.e. it doesn't serve its
main purpose of signalling AOP of
the correct state of Q6 during
system suspend/resume. Thus we
can maintain current functionality
even without the load state votes
i.e. when a new kernel with load
state removed is used with an older
dtb the remoteproc functionality
will remain the same.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists