[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UAD1dM9EqGDr1zLDUmrLMPxmAp7-da+ifqXvDcRbpqdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 08:45:29 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To: yangcong <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 2/2] dt-bindings: drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Support
enabling a 3.3V rail
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:01 AM yangcong
<yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> The auo,b101uan08.3 panel (already supported by this driver) has
> a 3.3V rail that needs to be turned on. For previous users of
> this panel this voltage was directly output by pmic. On a new
> user (the not-yet-upstream sc7180-trogdor-mrbland board) we need
> to turn the 3.3V rail on.
>
> Signed-off-by: yangcong <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
However you're sending your patches is really confusing my email
client. I think part of the problem is that you sent "v2" as
"In-Reply-To" your "v1". You shouldn't do that. You also seem to be
sending duplicates. :(
Might I suggest using "patman" to simplify things for you?
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/blob/master/tools/patman/README
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml
> index 38bc1d1b511e..a7091ae0f791 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ properties:
> pp1800-supply:
> description: core voltage supply
>
> + pp3300-supply:
> + description: core voltage supply
This would probably be slightly better if it said "3.3 V supply"
instead of "core voltage supply", but it doesn't matter a ton to me.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists