linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad84bc55-07c6-2edf-bc5c-0cf3f452b60b@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:59:14 -0400
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cohuck@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler
 function pointer



On 8/19/21 1:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:54:33AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
>> Nope.  The only requests for merges through my tree that I'm aware of
>> were [1] and what I understand was the evolution of that here now [2].
>> Maybe you're thinking of [3], which I do see in mainline where this was
>> 2/2 in that series but afaict only patch 1/2 was committed.  I guess
>> that explains why there was no respin based on comments for this patch.
>> Thanks,
> Tony,
>
> If you take Alex's tree from here:
>
> https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio/commits/next
>
> And rebase + repost exactly the patches you need applied it would be
> helpful.

Will do.

>
> Jason