linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] arm64: PCI: Support root bridge preparation for Hyper-V

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210820174947.GB23080@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:49:47 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] arm64: PCI: Support root bridge preparation for
 Hyper-V

Hi Boqun,

Sorry, I just got back from holiday and I'm still in the deleting emails
mode.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:13:22AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Appreciate it that you can have a look at this one and patch #4, note
> that there exists an alternative solution at[1].
> 
> The difference is the way used to pass the corresponding ACPI device
> pointers for PCI host bridges: currently pci_config_window->parent is
> used, and this patch and patch #4 allow the field to be NULL, because
> Hyper-V's PCI host bridges don't have ACPI devices, while [1] changes to
> use pci_host_bridge->private. And I'm OK with either way, I don't have a
> strong opinion here ;-)
[...]
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210811153619.88922-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/

I'm ok with the arm64 bits in this series and the one you linked above.
It's up to Lorenzo if he's happy with how pci-hyperv.c ends up looking,
I'm not a PCIe expert. My preference would be for a combined series
(this and [1] above).

Happy to ack the arm64 patches in a combined series (if you are going to
post one), the changes would look even simpler.

-- 
Catalin