[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3977072.uyyoESeOv6@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 05:59:20 +0200
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] staging: r8188eu: add error handling to ReadFuse
Dear Pavel
On Saturday, August 21, 2021 1:51:57 AM CEST Phillip Potter wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 18:07, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > ReadEFuseByte() internally calls rtw_read8() which can fail. To avoid
> > uninit value bugs we should properly handle error sutiation and deliver
sutiation --> situation.
> > the error to caller.
> >
> > To achieve it, some functions now return an int, and the error
> > which could occur in ReadEFuseByte() is handled on the top level.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c | 46 +++++++++-----
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/hal_intf.c | 6 +-
> > .../staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_hal_init.c | 62 +++++++++++++------
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c | 20 ++++--
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c | 43 +++++++++++--
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h | 6 +-
> > .../staging/r8188eu/include/rtl8188e_hal.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_efuse.h | 4 +-
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c | 4 +-
> > 9 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> >
Please change the Subject: ReadFuse --> ReadEFuse() or
ReadFuse --> ReadEFuseByte().
>
> Dear Pavel,
>
> I like the code, just a few things though:
> (1) the comments I made in the previous e-mail r.e. what we actually
> do with the errors, and grouping logically related changes (the rest
> of the usb_read*() changes being in this patch for example).
I agree with Philip on splitting 1/3 into more patches, perhaps one for each
of the three rtw_read*(), but I disagree on merging the usb_read*() changes
into this. They should go to another patch because they are not strictly
related to "add[ing] error handling to ReadFuse".
Regards,
Fabio
> (2) I got trailing whitespace errors from this patch and the last one.
> For a v2 I would say stripping the whitespace is a good idea too - I
> have submitted many patches myself to this driver that had whitespace
> in - indeed, the original version of my patch series to import the
> driver still had a load as well :-)
>
> Regards,
> Phil
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists