lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 21 Aug 2021 12:38:35 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, <kbuild-all@...ts.01.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild] drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c:531:8: warning:
 Excessive padding in 'struct bd718xx_regulator_data' (8 padding bytes, where
 0 is optimal).

Hi Mark,

On 8/19/2021 11:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:49:13PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for bothering, we'll ignore struct padding warnings next time.
> 
> I think the warnings are useful, it's just that they're not important
> for all structs.  If the struct was getting allocated a lot it could be
> pointing out an issue that makes a real difference.  I'm not sure it s
> realistic for automation to figure it out for itself so it's better to
> send them even if they get ignored a lot.
> 

It's not very practical for automation to figure out how many copies of 
a struct would be created and how much space would be saved in total by 
adjusting struct padding.

For similar warnings in the future, we'll make an effort to do manual 
check first, and send out reports that we think are worthy of notice.

Best Regards,
Yujie Liu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ