linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5, 00/15] Using component framework to support multi hardware decode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKMK7uFW3Z=Up=OCJO4dNR9ffaTdFjHwoND9CrUw6LHmQ4t_AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Aug 2021 18:50:23 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Cc:     Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>,
        Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Fritz Koenig <frkoenig@...omium.org>,
        Irui Wang <irui.wang@...iatek.com>,
        linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        George Sun <george.sun@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5, 00/15] Using component framework to support multi
 hardware decode

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:12 PM Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
>
> +danvet
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 23:58, Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > This series adds support for multi hardware decode into mtk-vcodec, by first
> > adding component framework to manage each hardware information: interrupt,
> > clock, register bases and power. Secondly add core thread to deal with core
> > hardware message, at the same time, add msg queue for different hardware
> > share messages. Lastly, the architecture of different specs are not the same,
> > using specs type to separate them.
> >
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to introduce the component API in the
> media subsystem. It doesn't seem to be maintained, IRC there's not even
> a maintainer for it, and it has some issues that were never addressed.

Defacto dri-devel folks are maintainer component.c, but also I'm not
aware of anything missing there?

There has been discussions that in various drm subsystems like
drm_bridge or drm_panel a few things are missing, which prevent
drivers from moving _away_ from component.c to the more specific
solutions for panel/bridges. But nothing that's preventing them from
using component.c itself.

I'm happy to merge a MAINTAINERS patch to clarify the situation if
that's needed.
-Daniel

> It would be really important to avoid it. Is it really needed in the
> first place?
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch