| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 22:21:11 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: nehal-bakulchandra.shah@....com, basavaraj.natikar@....com,
jikos@...nel.org, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] HID: amd_sfh: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
It has been compile tested.
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
+ DMA_TO_DEVICE
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
+ DMA_FROM_DEVICE
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_NONE
+ DMA_NONE
@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
- pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+ dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
- pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+ dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
@@
- pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
+ dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
+ dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
It is *NOT* been compile tested, but it looks safe enough!
---
drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
index 8d68796aa905..fa313c75a8a0 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
@@ -229,9 +229,9 @@ static int amd_mp2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *i
privdata->mmio = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[2];
pci_set_master(pdev);
- rc = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
+ rc = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
if (rc) {
- rc = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+ rc = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
return rc;
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists