linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH NET v4 3/7] ipv6: use skb_expand_head in ip6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7d71f2cc-3fff-beff-b82b-d0a81fb60429@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:44:29 +0300
From:   Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...nvz.org,
        Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH NET v4 3/7] ipv6: use skb_expand_head in ip6_xmit

On 8/22/21 8:13 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 10:04 AM Christoph Paasch
> <christoph.paasch@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Vasily,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:21 PM Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/21/21 1:44 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>>>> (resend without html - thanks gmail web-interface...)
>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:41 PM Christoph Paasch
>>>>> AFAICS, this is because pskb_expand_head (called from
>>>>> skb_expand_head) is not adjusting skb->truesize when skb->sk is set
>>>>> (which I guess is the case in this particular scenario). I'm not
>>>>> sure what the proper fix would be though...
>>>
>>> Could you please elaborate?
>>> it seems to me skb_realloc_headroom used before my patch called pskb_expand_head() too
>>> and did not adjusted skb->truesize too. Am I missed something perhaps?
>>>
>>> The only difference in my patch is that skb_clone can be not called,
>>> though I do not understand how this can affect skb->truesize.
>>
>> I *believe* that the difference is that after skb_clone() skb->sk is
>> NULL and thus truesize will be adjusted.
>>
>> I will try to confirm that with some more debugging.
> 
> Yes indeed.
> 
> Before your patch:
> [   19.154039] ip6_xmit before realloc truesize 4864 sk? 000000002ccd6868
> [   19.155230] ip6_xmit after realloc truesize 5376 sk? 0000000000000000
> 
> skb->sk is not set and thus truesize will be adjusted.

This looks strange for me. skb should not lost sk reference.

Could you please clarify where exactly you cheked it?
sk on newly allocated skb is set on line 291

net/ipv6/ip6_output.c::ip6_xmit()
 282         if (unlikely(skb_headroom(skb) < head_room)) {
 283                 struct sk_buff *skb2 = skb_realloc_headroom(skb, head_room);
 284                 if (!skb2) {
 285                         IP6_INC_STATS(net, ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb)),
 286                                       IPSTATS_MIB_OUTDISCARDS);
 287                         kfree_skb(skb);
 288                         return -ENOBUFS;
 289                 }
 290                 if (skb->sk)
 291                         skb_set_owner_w(skb2, skb->sk); <<<<< here
 292                 consume_skb(skb);
 293                 skb = skb2;
 294         }

> With your change:
> [   15.092933] ip6_xmit before realloc truesize 4864 sk? 00000000072930fd
> [   15.094131] ip6_xmit after realloc truesize 4864 sk? 00000000072930fd
> 
> skb->sk is set and thus truesize is not adjusted.

In this case skb_set_owner_w() is called inside skb_expand_head()

net/ipv6/ip6_output.c::ip6_xmit()
 265         if (unlikely(head_room > skb_headroom(skb))) {
 266                 skb = skb_expand_head(skb, head_room);
 267                 if (!skb) {
 268                         IP6_INC_STATS(net, idev, IPSTATS_MIB_OUTDISCARDS);
 269                         return -ENOBUFS;
 270                 }
 271         }

net/core/skbuff.c::skb_expand_head()
1813         if (skb_shared(skb)) {
1814                 struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
1815 
1816                 if (likely(nskb)) {
1817                         if (skb->sk)
1818                                 skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk);  <<<< here
1819                         consume_skb(skb);
1820                 } else {
1821                         kfree_skb(skb);
1822                 }
1823                 skb = nskb;
1824         }

So I do not understand how this can happen.
With my patch: 
a) if skb is not shared -- it should keep original skb->sk
b) if skb is shared -- new skb should set sk if it was set on original skb.

Your results can be explained if you looked and skb->sk and truesize right after skb_realloc_headroom() call
but  before following skb_set_owner_w(). Could you please check it?

Thank you,
	Vasily Averin