[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210823092404.0a9b68e4@xps13>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:24:04 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] mtd: spinand: Setup spi_mem_op for the SPI IO
protocol using reg_proto
Hi Boris,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote on Mon, 23 Aug
2021 09:11:45 +0200:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:08:40 +0200
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Apurva,
> >
> > Boris, you might have a good idea for the naming discussed below?
>
> {patch,adjust,tweak}_op() all sound good to me. This being said, I'm
> a bit concerned about doing this op tweaking in the hot-path.
> Looks like something that should be done at probe or when switching to
> 8D mode, and kept around. The alternative would be to have per-mode op
> tables, which I think would be clearer.
True! Thanks for the idea!
Cheers,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists