linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Handle update hardware queues and queue freeze more carefully

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YSNoHVsQXKqmJ9nO@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:19:25 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ibm.com>,
        Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Handle update hardware queues and queue freeze
 more carefully

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:14:05AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 09:01:46AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > applied to nvme-5.15.
> 
> Could you drop these patches again? James just sent me a new version of
> the series which addresses the points we discussed in this thread. They
> look good to me but I'd like to give them a spin and will post them
> shortly. Also James is giving them a test run.

Ok.