lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:06:41 +0800
From:   Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org
Cc:     Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] tty: Fix data race between tiocsti() and flush_to_ldisc()

The ops->receive_buf() may be accessed concurrently from these two
functions.  If the driver flushes data to the line discipline
receive_buf() method while tiocsti() is waiting for the
ops->receive_buf() to finish its work, the data race will happen.

For example:
tty_ioctl			|tty_ldisc_receive_buf
 ->tioctsi			| ->tty_port_default_receive_buf
				|  ->tty_ldisc_receive_buf
   ->hci_uart_tty_receive	|   ->hci_uart_tty_receive
    ->h4_recv                   |    ->h4_recv

In this case, the h4 receive buffer will be overwritten by the
latecomer, and we will lost the data.

Hence, change tioctsi() function to use the exclusive lock interface
from tty_buffer to avoid the data race.

Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
---
V2:
	- Remove FIXME comment.

 drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index e8532006e960..6616d4a0d41d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -2290,8 +2290,6 @@ static int tty_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, int on)
  *	Locking:
  *		Called functions take tty_ldiscs_lock
  *		current->signal->tty check is safe without locks
- *
- *	FIXME: may race normal receive processing
  */

 static int tiocsti(struct tty_struct *tty, char __user *p)
@@ -2307,8 +2305,10 @@ static int tiocsti(struct tty_struct *tty, char __user *p)
 	ld = tty_ldisc_ref_wait(tty);
 	if (!ld)
 		return -EIO;
+	tty_buffer_lock_exclusive(tty->port);
 	if (ld->ops->receive_buf)
 		ld->ops->receive_buf(tty, &ch, &mbz, 1);
+	tty_buffer_unlock_exclusive(tty->port);
 	tty_ldisc_deref(ld);
 	return 0;
 }
--
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ