[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <GGIAYQ.PS5EB67PH64N@ljones.dev>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:26:40 +1200
From: Luke Jones <luke@...nes.dev>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] asus-wmi: Add support for custom fan curves
On Mon, Aug 23 2021 at 12:28:21 +0200, Bastien Nocera
<hadess@...ess.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 09:30 +1200, Luke Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20 2021 at 13:39:02 +0200, Bastien Nocera
>> <hadess@...ess.net> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2021-08-20 at 23:00 +1200, Luke Jones wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Aug 20 2021 at 12:51:08 +0200, Bastien Nocera
>> > > <hadess@...ess.net> wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, 2021-08-20 at 12:43 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > > > > On Fri, 2021-08-20 at 22:33 +1200, Luke Jones wrote:
>> > > > > > > Am I going to get bug reports from Asus users that
>> will
>> > > > > complain
>> > > > > > > that
>> > > > > > > power-profiles-daemon doesn't work correctly, where I
>> > > will
>> > > > > have
>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > wearily ask if they're using an Asus Rog laptop?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > No. Definitely not. The changes to fan curves
>> per-profile
>> > > need
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > > be
>> > > > > > explicitly enabled and set. So a new user will be
>> unaware
>> > > that
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > > control exists (until they look for it) and their laptop
>> > > will
>> > > > > > behave
>> > > > > > exactly as default.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "The user will need to change the fan curves manually so
>> > > will
>> > > > > definitely remember to mention it in bug reports" is a
>> very
>> > > > > different
>> > > > > thing to "the user can't change the fan curves to be
>> > > nonsensical
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > mean opposite things".
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I can assure you that I will eventually get bug reports
>> > > from
>> > > > > "power
>> > > > > users" who break their setup and wonder why things don't
>> > > work
>> > > > > properly,
>> > > > > without ever mentioning the changes they made changes to
>> > > the
>> > > fan
>> > > > > curves, or anything else they might have changed.
>> > > >
>> > > > A way to taint the settings that power-profiles-daemon could
>> > > catch
>> > > > would be fine by me. I absolutely don't want to have to
>> > > support
>> > > > somebody's tweaks until they undo them.
>> > >
>> > > Definitely understood. Do you have something in mind?
>> >
>> > A sysfs attribute with boolean data that shows whether custom fan
>> > curves are used would be enough.
>>
>> The path /sys/devices/platform/asus-nb-wmi/active_fan_curve_profiles
>> should be usable like this? I added this as the method for
>> controlling
>> which fan curves for which profiles are active.
>>
>> If empty, then no custom fan curves are active at all. If it
>> contains
>> any combination of strings "quiet, balanced, performance" then those
>> associated (named) platform_profiles have an active fan curve and
>> you
>> can throw up a general warning, maybe add the contents of that file
>> too?
>
> That works for me, although I would probably have preferred a way that
> wasn't specific to the asus-wmi module, I'm sure I can made do with
> that.
Oh I see, you were looking to get a more general solution implemented?
Maybe something like
"/sys/devices/platform/asus-nb-wmi/platform_profile_tainted"? This
could be an opportunity to maybe make a standardised naming scheme for
it.
If you want something like that I'll get it done for asus-wmi.
>
> Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists