[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSLpBFLdeTzH0gmp@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 03:17:08 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tfiga@...omium.org, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 19/21] uvcvideo: don't spam the log in
uvc_ctrl_restore_values()
Hi Hans,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 02:29:21PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
>
> Don't report the restored controls with dev_info, use dev_dbg instead.
> This prevents a lot of noise in the kernel log.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
The author and SoB line don't match. Which one should I update ?
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> index 11c25d4b5c20..da44d5c0b9ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> @@ -2153,10 +2153,10 @@ int uvc_ctrl_restore_values(struct uvc_device *dev)
> if (!ctrl->initialized || !ctrl->modified ||
> (ctrl->info.flags & UVC_CTRL_FLAG_RESTORE) == 0)
> continue;
> - dev_info(&dev->udev->dev,
> - "restoring control %pUl/%u/%u\n",
> - ctrl->info.entity, ctrl->info.index,
> - ctrl->info.selector);
> + dev_dbg(&dev->udev->dev,
> + "restoring control %pUl/%u/%u\n",
> + ctrl->info.entity, ctrl->info.index,
> + ctrl->info.selector);
> ctrl->dirty = 1;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists