[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210823150927.jhobzfxy6e4s663r@pali>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:09:27 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: uniphier: Serialize INTx masking/unmasking
+ Marc (who originally reported this issue)
On Monday 23 August 2021 20:18:20 Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> The condition register PCI_RCV_INTX is used in irq_mask(), irq_unmask()
> and irq_ack() callbacks. Accesses to register can occur at the same time
> without a lock.
> Add a lock into each callback to prevent the issue.
>
> Fixes: 7e6d5cd88a6f ("PCI: uniphier: Add UniPhier PCIe host controller support")
> Suggested-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> The previous patch is as follows:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1629370566-29984-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com/
>
> Changes in the previous patch:
> - Change the subject and commit message
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> index ebe43e9..5075714 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> @@ -186,12 +186,17 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> + unsigned long flags;
> u32 val;
>
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> +
> val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_STATUS;
> val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_STATUS_SHIFT);
> writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> }
>
> static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -199,12 +204,17 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> + unsigned long flags;
> u32 val;
>
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> +
> val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
> writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> }
>
> static void uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -212,12 +222,17 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> + unsigned long flags;
> u32 val;
>
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> +
> val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> val &= ~BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
> writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> }
>
> static struct irq_chip uniphier_pcie_irq_chip = {
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists