[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSRUNzVEig80IBtq@fedora>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:06:47 -0400
From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] kernel/workqueue: Make schedule_on_each_cpu as
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 02:12:29AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Make schedule_on_each_cpu as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> [v1 -> v2]: Use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL
>
> kernel/workqueue.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index f148eacda55a..993f8983186d 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -3309,6 +3309,7 @@ int schedule_on_each_cpu(work_func_t func)
> free_percpu(works);
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(schedule_on_each_cpu);
>
> /**
> * execute_in_process_context - reliably execute the routine with user context
> --
> 2.31.1
>
I think you missed the point of Christoph's comment. I agree with him
and don't think a test justifies exporting of this particular function.
Thanks,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists