linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.13 123/127] kfence: fix is_kfence_address() for addresses below KFENCE_POOL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210824165607.709387-124-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:56:03 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 123/127] kfence: fix is_kfence_address() for addresses below KFENCE_POOL_SIZE

From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit a7cb5d23eaea148f8582229846f8dfff192f05c3 ]

Originally the addr != NULL check was meant to take care of the case
where __kfence_pool == NULL (KFENCE is disabled).  However, this does
not work for addresses where addr > 0 && addr < KFENCE_POOL_SIZE.

This can be the case on NULL-deref where addr > 0 && addr < PAGE_SIZE or
any other faulting access with addr < KFENCE_POOL_SIZE.  While the
kernel would likely crash, the stack traces and report might be
confusing due to double faults upon KFENCE's attempt to unprotect such
an address.

Fix it by just checking that __kfence_pool != NULL instead.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210818130300.2482437-1-elver@google.com
Fixes: 0ce20dd84089 ("mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>    [5.12+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/kfence.h | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kfence.h b/include/linux/kfence.h
index a70d1ea03532..3fe6dd8a18c1 100644
--- a/include/linux/kfence.h
+++ b/include/linux/kfence.h
@@ -51,10 +51,11 @@ extern atomic_t kfence_allocation_gate;
 static __always_inline bool is_kfence_address(const void *addr)
 {
 	/*
-	 * The non-NULL check is required in case the __kfence_pool pointer was
-	 * never initialized; keep it in the slow-path after the range-check.
+	 * The __kfence_pool != NULL check is required to deal with the case
+	 * where __kfence_pool == NULL && addr < KFENCE_POOL_SIZE. Keep it in
+	 * the slow-path after the range-check!
 	 */
-	return unlikely((unsigned long)((char *)addr - __kfence_pool) < KFENCE_POOL_SIZE && addr);
+	return unlikely((unsigned long)((char *)addr - __kfence_pool) < KFENCE_POOL_SIZE && __kfence_pool);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.30.2