linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Fix a bug on removing child devices on the bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BY5PR21MB1506884F67EFBDB6804ECCB0CEC59@BY5PR21MB1506.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:30:48 +0000
From:   Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        "longli@...uxonhyperv.com" <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
CC:     "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Fix a bug on removing child devices on the bus

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Fix a bug on removing child devices on the bus
> 
> "Fix a bug ..." is not a very useful subject line.  It doesn't say anything about what
> the patch *does*.  It doesn't hint at a locking change.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:20:20AM -0700, longli@...uxonhyperv.com wrote:
> > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > In hv_pci_bus_exit, the code is holding a spinlock while calling
> > pci_destroy_slot(), which takes a mutex.
> 
> It's unfortunate that slots are not better integrated into the PCI core.  I'm sorry
> your driver even has to worry about this.
> >
> > This is not safe for spinlock. Fix this by moving the children to be
> > deleted to a list on the stack, and removing them after spinlock is
> > released.
> >
> > Fixes: 94d22763207a ("PCI: hv: Fix a race condition when removing the
> > device")
> >
> > Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@...ux.com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> 
> A lore link to Dan's report would be useful here.

I will address your comments and send v2.

Long

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> > index a53bd8728d0d..d4f3cce18957 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> > @@ -3220,6 +3220,7 @@ static int hv_pci_bus_exit(struct hv_device *hdev,
> bool keep_devs)
> >  	struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev, *tmp;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  	int ret;
> > +	struct list_head removed;
> >
> >  	/*
> >  	 * After the host sends the RESCIND_CHANNEL message, it doesn't @@
> > -3229,9 +3230,18 @@ static int hv_pci_bus_exit(struct hv_device *hdev, bool
> keep_devs)
> >  		return 0;
> >
> >  	if (!keep_devs) {
> > -		/* Delete any children which might still exist. */
> > +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&removed);
> > +
> > +		/* Move all present children to the list on stack */
> >  		spin_lock_irqsave(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> > -		list_for_each_entry_safe(hpdev, tmp, &hbus->children,
> list_entry) {
> > +		list_for_each_entry_safe(hpdev, tmp, &hbus->children,
> list_entry)
> > +			list_move_tail(&hpdev->list_entry, &removed);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +		/* Remove all children in the list */
> > +		while (!list_empty(&removed)) {
> > +			hpdev = list_first_entry(&removed, struct hv_pci_dev,
> > +						 list_entry);
> >  			list_del(&hpdev->list_entry);
> >  			if (hpdev->pci_slot)
> >  				pci_destroy_slot(hpdev->pci_slot);
> > @@ -3239,7 +3249,6 @@ static int hv_pci_bus_exit(struct hv_device *hdev,
> bool keep_devs)
> >  			put_pcichild(hpdev);
> >  			put_pcichild(hpdev);
> >  		}
> > -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> >  	}
> >
> >  	ret = hv_send_resources_released(hdev);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >