[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9423ddab-4635-ea15-7a9d-dbcf1bc215dc@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:02:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: mmc: cdns: match MPFS MMC/SDHCI
controller
On 24/08/2021 16:33, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 05:44:32PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Microchip MPFS Icicle Kit uses Cadence SD/SDIO/eMMC Host Controller
>> without any additional vendor compatible:
>
> I think the lack of vendor compatible is the error here. Experience has
> shown that vendor specific compatibles are needed for licensed IP.
>
In such case this could be:
1. a specific "microchip,mpfs250t-sd4hc", which
seems to be on MPFS Icicle Kit:
https://www.digikey.co.uk/en/product-highlight/m/microchip-technology/mpfs-icicle-kit-es--polarfire-soc-fpga-icicle-kit
2. or a generic "microchip,mpfs-sd4hc"
Any hints here?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists