linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Add Broadcom bcm2711 MCFG quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ddffee4b-8136-9ca1-85f7-bfdbac07bfe7@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:39:20 -0500
From:   Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, nsaenz@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
        sdonthineni@...dia.com, stefan.wahren@...e.com,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Add Broadcom bcm2711 MCFG quirk

Hi,

On 8/22/21 3:53 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/19/2021 11:56 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> Now that there is a bcm2711 quirk, it needs to be enabled when the
>> MCFG is missing. Use an ACPI namespace _DSD property
>> "linux-ecam-quirk-id" as an alternative to the MCFG OEM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> index 53cab975f612..4b991ee5c66c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = {
>>       ALTRA_ECAM_QUIRK(1, 13),
>>       ALTRA_ECAM_QUIRK(1, 14),
>>       ALTRA_ECAM_QUIRK(1, 15),
>> +
>> +    { "bcm2711", "", 0, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &bcm2711_pcie_ops,
>> +      DEFINE_RES_MEM(0xFD500000, 0xA000) },
>>   };
>>   static char mcfg_oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE];
>> @@ -198,8 +201,18 @@ static void pci_mcfg_apply_quirks(struct 
>> acpi_pci_root *root,
>>       u16 segment = root->segment;
>>       struct resource *bus_range = &root->secondary;
>>       struct mcfg_fixup *f;
>> +    const char *soc;
>>       int i;
>> +    /*
>> +     * This may be a machine with a PCI/SMC conduit, which means it 
>> doesn't
>> +     * have an MCFG. Use an ACPI namespace definition instead.
>> +     */
>> +    if (!fwnode_property_read_string(acpi_fwnode_handle(root->device),
>> +                     "linux-ecam-quirk-id", &soc)) {
>> +        memcpy(mcfg_oem_id, soc, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE);
> 
> Being super paranoid here, can we use one of the "safe" string copy 
> routines here just in case?

Hmm, I went around with this a bit when I first wrote it, because the 
OEM fields in the ACPI tables are fixed len and don't have null 
termination. Maybe the right thing to do here is verify the string size 
is at least as long as the OEM_ID_SIZE and then continue to use the memcpy.

> 
>> +    }
>> +
>>       for (i = 0, f = mcfg_quirks; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mcfg_quirks); i++, 
>> f++) {
>>           if (pci_mcfg_quirk_matches(f, segment, bus_range)) {
>>               if (f->cfgres.start)
>>
>