linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ucounts: Fix regression preventing increasing of rlimits in init_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lf4rplsu.fsf@disp2133>
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:24:17 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     "Ma\, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@...el.com>
Cc:     Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkp <lkp@...el.com>,
        "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "axboe\@kernel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "christian.brauner\@ubuntu.com" <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        "containers\@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
        <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "jannh\@google.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "keescook\@chromium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "kernel-hardening\@lists.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm\@kvack.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "oleg\@redhat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "torvalds\@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucounts: Fix regression preventing increasing of rlimits in init_user_ns

"Ma, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@...el.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> ...
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@...el.com
> Sorry, but <> around email address is needed 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

The change is already tested and pushed out so I really don't want to
mess with it.  Especially as I am aiming to send it to Linus on
Wednesday after it has had a chance to pass through linux-next and
whatever automated tests are there.

What does copying and pasting the Reported-by: tag as included in
your original report cause to break?

At this point I suspect that the danger of fat fingering something
far outweighs whatever benefits might be gained by surrounding the
email address with <> marks.

Eric