linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] staging: r8188eu: add error handling of rtw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:53:37 +0300
From:   Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To:     Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] staging: r8188eu: add error handling of
 rtw_read32

On 8/24/21 2:33 AM, Phillip Potter wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 15:36, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com> wrote:
>> -static u32 usb_read32(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u32 addr)
>> +static int usb_read32(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u32 addr, u32 *data)
>>  {
>>         u8 requesttype;
>>         u16 wvalue;
>>         u16 len;
>> -       __le32 data;
>> +       int res;
>> +       __le32 tmp;
>> +
>> +       if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!data)))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>
>>         requesttype = 0x01;/* read_in */
>>
>>         wvalue = (u16)(addr & 0x0000ffff);
>>         len = 4;
>>
>> -       usbctrl_vendorreq(pintfhdl, wvalue, &data, len, requesttype);
>> +       res = usbctrl_vendorreq(pintfhdl, wvalue, &data, len, requesttype);
>> +       if (res < 0) {
>> +               dev_err(dvobj_to_dev(pintfhdl->pintf_dev), "Failed to read 32 bytes: %d\n", res);
>> +       } else {
>> +               /* Noone cares about positive return value */
>> +               *data = le32_to_cpu(tmp);
>> +               res = 0;
>> +       }
>>
>> -       return le32_to_cpu(data);
>> +       return res;
>>  }
> 
> Dear Pavel,
> 
> OK, found the issue with decoded stack trace after reviewing this
> usb_read32 function. Your line:
> res = usbctrl_vendorreq(pintfhdl, wvalue, &data, len, requesttype);
> 
> should read:
> res = usbctrl_vendorreq(pintfhdl, wvalue, &tmp, len, requesttype);
> 
> With this change, the driver runs fine with no crashes/oopses. I will
> explain the issue but you can probably see already, so I hope I'm not
> coming across as patronising, just trying to be helpful :-)
> 
> Essentially, you are taking the address of the data function parameter
> on this line with &data, a pointer to u32, which is giving you a
> pointer to a pointer to u32 (u32 **) for this function parameter
> variable. When passed to usbctrl_vendorreq, it is being passed to
> memcpy inside this function as a void *, meaning that memcpy
> subsequently overwrites the value of the memory address inside data to
> point to a different location, which is problem when it is later
> deferenced at:
> *data = le32_to_cpu(tmp);
> causing the OOPS
> 

The most strange thing is why gcc didn't complain about different 
pointer types... I think, that gcc must complain about this type of not 
explicit casts, because 99% it's a bug.


Again big thanks for analysis :)



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin