| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:00:19 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 21/25] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 3:56 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Before changing anything about memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), add
> run-time tests to check basic behaviors for any regressions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
Thanks for adding a KUnit test here: it's great to have better
coverage of some of these basic functions!
There's a name mismatch with the Kconfig entry and the Makefile,
otherwise this looks good and works fine on my machine (under both UML
and qemu/x86_64).
It would be possible to split these tests up further if you wanted,
which could be useful if there's a desire to track the individual
assertion results independently. That's probably what I'd've done, but
It's a matter of personal preference either way, though: the tests
aren't absurdly huge or over-complicated as-is.
Cheers,
-- David
> MAINTAINERS | 9 ++
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 ++
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/test_memcpy.c | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 286 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 lib/test_memcpy.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 6c8be735cc91..e3ffd4bdc24f 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -7248,6 +7248,15 @@ L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
> F: drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/*
>
> +FORTIFY_SOURCE
> +M: Kees Cook <keescook@...mium.org>
> +L: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
> +S: Supported
> +F: include/linux/fortify-string.h
> +F: lib/test_fortify/*
> +F: scripts/test_fortify.sh
> +K: \b__NO_FORTIFY\b
> +
Do you want this to be part of the memcpy() KUnit test commit, or is
it better suited in one of the changes to the actual fortify stuff?
> FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> M: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> R: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 831212722924..9199be57ba2a 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -2467,6 +2467,17 @@ config RATIONAL_KUNIT_TEST
>
> If unsure, say N.
>
> +config MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST
> + tristate "Test memcpy(), memmove(), and memset() functions at runtime" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on KUNIT
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + help
> + Builds unit tests for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset() functions.
> + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
> + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> config TEST_UDELAY
> tristate "udelay test driver"
> help
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index bd17c2bf43e1..8a4c8bdb38a2 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MIN_HEAP) += test_min_heap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LKM) += test_module.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) += test_vmalloc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_OVERFLOW) += test_overflow.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY) += test_memcpy.o
This doesn't match CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST above, so the test is
never compiled in.
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_RHASHTABLE) += test_rhashtable.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_SORT) += test_sort.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_USER_COPY) += test_user_copy.o
> diff --git a/lib/test_memcpy.c b/lib/test_memcpy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ec546cec883e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/test_memcpy.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Test cases for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset().
> + */
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +
> +struct some_bytes {
> + union {
> + u8 data[32];
> + struct {
> + u32 one;
> + u16 two;
> + u8 three;
> + /* 1 byte hole */
> + u32 four[4];
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +#define check(instance, v) do { \
> + int i; \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(instance.data) != 32); \
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(instance.data); i++) { \
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, instance.data[i], v, \
> + "line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %d (saw 0x%02x)\n", \
> + __LINE__, #instance, v, i, instance.data[i]); \
> + } \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#define compare(name, one, two) do { \
> + int i; \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(one) != sizeof(two)); \
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(one); i++) { \
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, one.data[i], two.data[i], \
> + "line %d: %s.data[%d] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%d] (0x%02x)\n", \
> + __LINE__, #one, i, one.data[i], #two, i, two.data[i]); \
> + } \
> + kunit_info(test, "ok: " TEST_OP "() " name "\n"); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +static void memcpy_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +#define TEST_OP "memcpy"
> + struct some_bytes control = {
> + .data = { 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes zero = { };
> + struct some_bytes middle = {
> + .data = { 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes three = {
> + .data = { 0x00, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes dest = { };
> + int count;
> + u8 *ptr;
> +
> + /* Verify static initializers. */
> + check(control, 0x20);
> + check(zero, 0);
> + compare("static initializers", dest, zero);
> +
> + /* Verify assignment. */
> + dest = control;
> + compare("direct assignment", dest, control);
> +
> + /* Verify complete overwrite. */
> + memcpy(dest.data, zero.data, sizeof(dest.data));
> + compare("complete overwrite", dest, zero);
> +
> + /* Verify middle overwrite. */
> + dest = control;
> + memcpy(dest.data + 12, zero.data, 7);
> + compare("middle overwrite", dest, middle);
> +
> + /* Verify argument side-effects aren't repeated. */
> + dest = control;
> + ptr = dest.data;
> + count = 1;
> + memcpy(ptr++, zero.data, count++);
> + ptr += 8;
> + memcpy(ptr++, zero.data, count++);
> + compare("argument side-effects", dest, three);
> +#undef TEST_OP
> +}
> +
> +static void memmove_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +#define TEST_OP "memmove"
> + struct some_bytes control = {
> + .data = { 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes zero = { };
> + struct some_bytes middle = {
> + .data = { 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes five = {
> + .data = { 0x00, 0x00, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes overlap = {
> + .data = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07,
> + 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes overlap_expected = {
> + .data = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x07,
> + 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes dest = { };
> + int count;
> + u8 *ptr;
> +
> + /* Verify static initializers. */
> + check(control, 0x99);
> + check(zero, 0);
> + compare("static initializers", zero, dest);
> +
> + /* Verify assignment. */
> + dest = control;
> + compare("direct assignment", dest, control);
> +
> + /* Verify complete overwrite. */
> + memmove(dest.data, zero.data, sizeof(dest.data));
> + compare("complete overwrite", dest, zero);
> +
> + /* Verify middle overwrite. */
> + dest = control;
> + memmove(dest.data + 12, zero.data, 7);
> + compare("middle overwrite", dest, middle);
> +
> + /* Verify argument side-effects aren't repeated. */
> + dest = control;
> + ptr = dest.data;
> + count = 2;
> + memmove(ptr++, zero.data, count++);
> + ptr += 9;
> + memmove(ptr++, zero.data, count++);
> + compare("argument side-effects", dest, five);
> +
> + /* Verify overlapping overwrite is correct. */
> + ptr = &overlap.data[2];
> + memmove(ptr, overlap.data, 5);
> + compare("overlapping write", overlap, overlap_expected);
> +#undef TEST_OP
> +}
> +
> +static void memset_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +#define TEST_OP "memset"
> + struct some_bytes control = {
> + .data = { 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes complete = {
> + .data = { 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes middle = {
> + .data = { 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31,
> + 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31,
> + 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes three = {
> + .data = { 0x60, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + 0x30, 0x61, 0x61, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30,
> + },
> + };
> + struct some_bytes dest = { };
> + int count, value;
> + u8 *ptr;
> +
> + /* Verify static initializers. */
> + check(control, 0x30);
> + check(dest, 0);
> +
> + /* Verify assignment. */
> + dest = control;
> + compare("direct assignment", dest, control);
> +
> + /* Verify complete overwrite. */
> + memset(dest.data, 0xff, sizeof(dest.data));
> + compare("complete overwrite", dest, complete);
> +
> + /* Verify middle overwrite. */
> + dest = control;
> + memset(dest.data + 4, 0x31, 16);
> + compare("middle overwrite", dest, middle);
> +
> + /* Verify argument side-effects aren't repeated. */
> + dest = control;
> + ptr = dest.data;
> + value = 0x60;
> + count = 1;
> + memset(ptr++, value++, count++);
> + ptr += 8;
> + memset(ptr++, value++, count++);
> + compare("argument side-effects", dest, three);
> +#undef TEST_OP
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case memcpy_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(memset_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(memcpy_test),
> + KUNIT_CASE(memmove_test),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite memcpy_test_suite = {
> + .name = "memcpy-test",
It may be better to just name the suite "memcpy", since -- by
definition -- it's a test if it's a KUnit test suite.
> + .test_cases = memcpy_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suite(memcpy_test_suite);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists