| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YSS9+k1teA9oPEKl@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:38:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@...il.com>
Cc: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tao.zhou@...ux.dev
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Simplify core-wide task selection
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:03:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Let me go do that and also attempt a Changelog to go with it ;-)
How's this then?
---
Subject: sched/core: Simplify core-wide task selection
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Tue Aug 24 11:05:47 CEST 2021
Tao suggested a two-pass task selection to avoid the retry loop.
Not only does it avoid the retry loop, it results in *much* simpler
code.
This also fixes an issue spotted by Josh Don where, for SMT3+, we can
forget to update max on the first pass and get to do an extra round.
Suggested-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 156 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index ceae25ea8a0e..8a9a32df5f38 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5381,8 +5381,7 @@ __pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
return p;
}
- /* The idle class should always have a runnable task: */
- BUG();
+ BUG(); /* The idle class should always have a runnable task. */
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
@@ -5404,54 +5403,18 @@ static inline bool cookie_match(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
return a->core_cookie == b->core_cookie;
}
-// XXX fairness/fwd progress conditions
-/*
- * Returns
- * - NULL if there is no runnable task for this class.
- * - the highest priority task for this runqueue if it matches
- * rq->core->core_cookie or its priority is greater than max.
- * - Else returns idle_task.
- */
-static struct task_struct *
-pick_task(struct rq *rq, const struct sched_class *class, struct task_struct *max, bool in_fi)
+static inline struct task_struct *pick_task(struct rq *rq)
{
- struct task_struct *class_pick, *cookie_pick;
- unsigned long cookie = rq->core->core_cookie;
-
- class_pick = class->pick_task(rq);
- if (!class_pick)
- return NULL;
-
- if (!cookie) {
- /*
- * If class_pick is tagged, return it only if it has
- * higher priority than max.
- */
- if (max && class_pick->core_cookie &&
- prio_less(class_pick, max, in_fi))
- return idle_sched_class.pick_task(rq);
+ const struct sched_class *class;
+ struct task_struct *p;
- return class_pick;
+ for_each_class(class) {
+ p = class->pick_task(rq);
+ if (p)
+ return p;
}
- /*
- * If class_pick is idle or matches cookie, return early.
- */
- if (cookie_equals(class_pick, cookie))
- return class_pick;
-
- cookie_pick = sched_core_find(rq, cookie);
-
- /*
- * If class > max && class > cookie, it is the highest priority task on
- * the core (so far) and it must be selected, otherwise we must go with
- * the cookie pick in order to satisfy the constraint.
- */
- if (prio_less(cookie_pick, class_pick, in_fi) &&
- (!max || prio_less(max, class_pick, in_fi)))
- return class_pick;
-
- return cookie_pick;
+ BUG(); /* The idle class should always have a runnable task. */
}
extern void task_vruntime_update(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool in_fi);
@@ -5459,11 +5422,12 @@ extern void task_vruntime_update(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool in_f
static struct task_struct *
pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
- struct task_struct *next, *max = NULL;
- const struct sched_class *class;
+ struct task_struct *next, *p, *max = NULL;
const struct cpumask *smt_mask;
bool fi_before = false;
- int i, j, cpu, occ = 0;
+ unsigned long cookie;
+ int i, cpu, occ = 0;
+ struct rq *rq_i;
bool need_sync;
if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
@@ -5536,12 +5500,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
* and there are no cookied tasks running on siblings.
*/
if (!need_sync) {
- for_each_class(class) {
- next = class->pick_task(rq);
- if (next)
- break;
- }
-
+ next = pick_task(rq);
if (!next->core_cookie) {
rq->core_pick = NULL;
/*
@@ -5554,76 +5513,51 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
}
}
- for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
- struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
-
- rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
+ /*
+ * For each thread: do the regular task pick and find the max prio task
+ * amongst them.
+ *
+ * Tie-break prio towards the current CPU
+ */
+ for_each_cpu_wrap(i, smt_mask, cpu) {
+ rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
if (i != cpu)
update_rq_clock(rq_i);
+
+ p = rq_i->core_pick = pick_task(rq_i);
+ if (!max || prio_less(max, p, fi_before))
+ max = p;
}
+ cookie = rq->core->core_cookie = max->core_cookie;
+
/*
- * Try and select tasks for each sibling in descending sched_class
- * order.
+ * For each thread: try and find a runnable task that matches @max or
+ * force idle.
*/
- for_each_class(class) {
-again:
- for_each_cpu_wrap(i, smt_mask, cpu) {
- struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
- struct task_struct *p;
-
- if (rq_i->core_pick)
- continue;
+ for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
+ rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+ p = rq_i->core_pick;
- /*
- * If this sibling doesn't yet have a suitable task to
- * run; ask for the most eligible task, given the
- * highest priority task already selected for this
- * core.
- */
- p = pick_task(rq_i, class, max, fi_before);
+ if (!cookie_equals(p, cookie)) {
+ p = NULL;
+ if (cookie)
+ p = sched_core_find(rq_i, cookie);
if (!p)
- continue;
+ p = idle_sched_class.pick_task(rq_i);
+ }
- if (!is_task_rq_idle(p))
- occ++;
+ rq_i->core_pick = p;
- rq_i->core_pick = p;
- if (rq_i->idle == p && rq_i->nr_running) {
+ if (p == rq_i->idle) {
+ if (rq_i->nr_running) {
rq->core->core_forceidle = true;
if (!fi_before)
rq->core->core_forceidle_seq++;
}
-
- /*
- * If this new candidate is of higher priority than the
- * previous; and they're incompatible; we need to wipe
- * the slate and start over. pick_task makes sure that
- * p's priority is more than max if it doesn't match
- * max's cookie.
- *
- * NOTE: this is a linear max-filter and is thus bounded
- * in execution time.
- */
- if (!max || !cookie_match(max, p)) {
- struct task_struct *old_max = max;
-
- rq->core->core_cookie = p->core_cookie;
- max = p;
-
- if (old_max) {
- rq->core->core_forceidle = false;
- for_each_cpu(j, smt_mask) {
- if (j == i)
- continue;
-
- cpu_rq(j)->core_pick = NULL;
- }
- occ = 1;
- goto again;
- }
- }
+ } else {
+ occ++;
}
}
@@ -5643,7 +5577,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
* non-matching user state.
*/
for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
- struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+ rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
/*
* An online sibling might have gone offline before a task
Powered by blists - more mailing lists