[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVNi4bh0Kp43BrVVKD8YY5ac4yi9=W3QZmw=stmwwtuiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:55:34 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Nick Kossifidis <mick@....forth.gr>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Add generic support for kdump DT properties
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:52 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 5:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 5:25 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:50:58AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > This patch series adds generic support for parsing DT properties related
> > > > to crash dump kernels ("linux,elfcorehdr" and "linux,elfcorehdr" under
> > > > the "/chosen" node), makes use of it on arm32, and performs a few
> > > > cleanups. It is an evolution of the combination of [1] and [2].
> > >
> > > The DT bits look fine to me. How do you expect this to be merged? I'm
> > > happy to take it if arch maintainers can ack it.
> >
> > I had hoped you could take the series...
>
> My current thought is I'll take 2-5, 7 and 8 given that's what I have
> acks for and the others can be applied independently.
Note that Palmer did ack patch 6, so you can include it.
Russell: any thoughts about patch 9?
Thanks!
> > > > The series consists of 6 parts:
> > > > 1. Patch 1 prepares architecture-specific code (needed for MIPS only)
> > > > to avoid duplicating elf core header reservation later.
> > > > 2. Patch 2 prepares the visibility of variables used to hold
> > > > information retrieved from the DT properties.
> > > > 3. Patches 3-5 add support to the FDT core for handling the
> > > > properties.
> > > > This can co-exist safely with architecture-specific handling, until
> > > > the latter has been removed.
> > >
> > > Looks like patch 5 doesn't have any dependencies with the series?
> >
> > Indeed. So you can take it independently.
> >
> > > > 4. Patch 6 removes the non-standard handling of "linux,elfcorehdr" on
> > > > riscv.
> > >
> > > I thought this should be applied for 5.14?
> >
> > Me too, but unfortunately that hasn't happened yet...
>
> Buried in the middle of this series is not going to encourage it to be
> picked up as a fix.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists