[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c4f61ff68544b2627fc4a38ad1e4109184ec68a.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:38:43 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: liqiong <liqiong@...china.com>,
THOBY Simon <Simon.THOBY@...eris.fr>
Cc: "dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com" <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"serge@...lyn.com" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock within "ima_match_policy" function.
On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 20:09 +0800, liqiong wrote:
> Hi Simon :
>
> ima: fix deadlock within RCU list of ima_rules.
>
Before the following paragraph, an introductory sentence is needed.
Try adding a sentence to the affect that "ima_rules" initially points
to the "ima_default_rules", but after loading a custom policy points to
the "ima_policy_rules". Then describe the bug at a high level,
something like - transitioning to the "ima_policy_rules" isn't being
done safely.
Followed by the details.
> ima_match_policy() is looping on the policy ruleset while
> ima_update_policy() updates the variable "ima_rules". This can
> lead to a situation where ima_match_policy() can't exit the
> 'list_for_each_entry_rcu' loop, causing RCU stalls
> ("rcu_sched detected stall on CPU ...").
>
> This problem can happen in practice: updating the IMA policy
> in the boot process while systemd-services are being checked.
>
> In addition to ima_match_policy(), other function with
> "list_for_each_entry_rcu" should happen too. Fix locking by
> introducing a duplicate of "ima_rules" for each
> "list_for_each_entry_rcu".
>
>
> How about this commit message ?
>
> I have tested this patch in lab, we can reproduced this error case,
> have done reboot test many times. This patch should work.
The above comment doesn't belong in the commit message, but is a
message to the reviewers/maintainers and goes after the patch
descriptions three dashes line.
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists