lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210824134457.x33n7ihoe23jhyfx@carbon.lan>
Date:   Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:44:57 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc:     linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: revalidate paths during rescan

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:16:23AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > +void nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> > +{
> > +	struct nvme_ns_head *head = ns->head;
> > +	sector_t capacity = get_capacity(head->disk);
> > +	int node;
> > +
> > +	for_each_node(node)
> > +		rcu_assign_pointer(head->current_path[node], NULL);
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ns, &head->list, siblings) {
> > +		if (capacity != get_capacity(ns->disk))
> > +			clear_bit(NVME_NS_READY, &ns->flags);
> > +	}
> 
> Shouldn't the null setting to current_path come after
> we clear NVME_NS_READY on the ns? Otherwise we may still
> submit and current_path will be populated with the ns
> again...

Ahh, I got it this time! Yes, you are right. I think Christoph has
dropped this patch from the nvme-5.15 queue anyway. I'll resend a new
version with the order changed.

Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ