linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] kernel:fair: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:43:03 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     CGEL <cgel.zte@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jing Yangyang <jing.yangyang@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] kernel:fair: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:42:44AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:41:28 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > Doesn't hurt to just take the patch and then you wont have to spend
> > time on new robots flagging this as a "bug".
> 
> Or if you don't want to give credit to theses silly robots, just go
> through the code yourself, and make one big cleanup. It's really
> trivial work.

I fundamentally disagree with the patches. 0 is a perfectly fine
spelling of false. And if they'd spend half a minute using google, I'm
sure they would have found me proclaiming as such.

Why should I waste time on people that can't be arsed to do their
homework?