| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr5_MqtbXsk9JWf+oYSFW+uU+W4otq-hu+ZYKq_p+Bokw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:56:45 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memstick: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
On Sat, 21 Aug 2021 at 23:13, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
>
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
> It has been compile tested.
>
> No memory allocation in involved in this patch, so no GFP_ tweak is needed.
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE
>
> @@ @@
> - PCI_DMA_NONE
> + DMA_NONE
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
> @@
> - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
> + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
> https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
> ---
> drivers/memstick/host/r592.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c b/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c
> index 615a83782e55..7ed984360349 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int r592_transfer_fifo_dma(struct r592_device *dev)
>
> /* TODO: hidden assumption about nenth beeing always 1 */
> sg_count = dma_map_sg(&dev->pci_dev->dev, &dev->req->sg, 1, is_write ?
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> if (sg_count != 1 || sg_dma_len(&dev->req->sg) < R592_LFIFO_SIZE) {
> message("problem in dma_map_sg");
> @@ -310,8 +310,7 @@ static int r592_transfer_fifo_dma(struct r592_device *dev)
> }
>
> dma_unmap_sg(&dev->pci_dev->dev, &dev->req->sg, 1, is_write ?
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> -
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> return dev->dma_error;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c b/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c
> index 57145374f6ac..c272453670be 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c
> @@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ static int tifm_ms_issue_cmd(struct tifm_ms *host)
> if (host->use_dma) {
> if (1 != tifm_map_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1,
> host->req->data_dir == READ
> - ? PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> - : PCI_DMA_TODEVICE)) {
> + ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE
> + : DMA_TO_DEVICE)) {
> host->req->error = -ENOMEM;
> return host->req->error;
> }
> @@ -350,8 +350,8 @@ static void tifm_ms_complete_cmd(struct tifm_ms *host)
> if (host->use_dma) {
> tifm_unmap_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1,
> host->req->data_dir == READ
> - ? PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> - : PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE
> + : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> }
>
> writel((~TIFM_CTRL_LED) & readl(sock->addr + SOCK_CONTROL),
> @@ -607,8 +607,8 @@ static void tifm_ms_remove(struct tifm_dev *sock)
> if (host->use_dma)
> tifm_unmap_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1,
> host->req->data_dir == READ
> - ? PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> - : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + ? DMA_TO_DEVICE
> + : DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> host->req->error = -ETIME;
>
> do {
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists