[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWA3_c13dCVUm7o2QzBmDN4G4fA6B+xSftx9FtEyYtT7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:32:52 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] riscv: microchip: mpfs: drop duplicated nodes
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 6:22 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
> On 19/08/2021 17:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The DTSI file defines soc node and address/size cells, so there is no
> > point in duplicating it in DTS file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts | 5 -----
> > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Now I wonder whether the subject prefix should be "riscv: dts:
> microchip:" instead?
Agreed.
For the actual patch contents:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists