[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iJVQKJ3bVwZhD08c8GNEP0jW2gx=H504NXcYK5o2t01A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:04:00 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
James E J Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/15] pci: Add pci_iomap_shared{,_range}
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 5:31 PM Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/23/21 4:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> Add a new variant of pci_iomap for mapping all PCI resources
> >> of a devices as shared memory with a hypervisor in a confidential
> >> guest.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen<ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> > I'm a bit puzzled by this part. So why should the guest*not* map
> > pci memory as shared? And if the answer is never (as it seems to be)
> > then why not just make regular pci_iomap DTRT?
>
> It is in the context of confidential guest (where VMM is un-trusted). So
> we don't want to make all PCI resource as shared. It should be allowed
> only for hardened drivers/devices.
That's confusing, isn't device authorization what keeps unaudited
drivers from loading against untrusted devices? I'm feeling like
Michael that this should be a detail that drivers need not care about
explicitly, in which case it does not need to be exported because the
detail can be buried in lower levels.
Note, I specifically said "unaudited", not "hardened" because as Greg
mentioned the kernel must trust drivers, its devices that may not be
trusted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists