lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210825052900.GA26714@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:29:00 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Gong, Sishuai" <sishuai@...due.edu>,
        "jlbec@...lplan.org" <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configfs: fix a race in configfs_lookup()

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:19:04AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 07:08:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > We can't hold a spinlock over inode allocation.  So it would have to be
> > something like this:
> 
> Check for -ENAMETOOLONG first; easier for analysis that way.

Indeed.

> > +			dentry->d_fsdata = configfs_get(sd);
> > +			sd->s_dentry = dentry;
> > +			spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> >  
> > -			found = 1;
> > -			err = configfs_attach_attr(sd, dentry);
> > -			break;
> > +			inode = configfs_create(dentry, mode);
> > +			if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
> > +				configfs_put(sd);
> > +				return ERR_CAST(inode);
> 
> Er...  Won't that leave dentry with dangling ->d_fsdata?

Yes.  Existing problem, though.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ