[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+U=DspfvNU6gwRGZjWMtjrDQV2=N8H5ARnq4Sz4HWZ=FBmn_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:11:07 +0300
From: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc128s052: Simplify 'adc128_probe()'
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:52 PM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Turn 'adc128_probe()' into a full resource managed function to simplify the
> code.
>
> This way, the .remove function can be removed.
> Doing so, the only 'spi_get_drvdata()' call is removed and the
> corresponding 'spi_set_drvdata()' can be removed as well.
>
Minor note inline. Nothing major.
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> Compile tested only.
>
> When reviewing, pay special attention to the 'spi_set_drvdata()' call
> removal. I recently introduced a regression with a too aggressive cleanup
> like that.
>
> This patch should be applied after
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/f33069f0-601b-4bbb-3766-026f7a161912@wanadoo.fr/T/#meb792dcd6540f87d9ae041660ca4738a776e924a
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 34 +++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> index 83c1ae07b3e9..e1afdb775100 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,13 @@ static const struct iio_info adc128_info = {
> .read_raw = adc128_read_raw,
> };
>
> +static void adc128_disable_regulator(void *data)
> +{
> + struct regulator *reg = data;
> +
> + regulator_disable(reg);
> +}
You can also do this as:
static void adc128_disable_regulator(void *reg)
{
regulator_disable(reg);
}
> +
> static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> @@ -151,8 +158,6 @@ static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> adc->spi = spi;
>
> - spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);
> -
> indio_dev->name = spi_get_device_id(spi)->name;
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> indio_dev->info = &adc128_info;
> @@ -167,29 +172,13 @@ static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> ret = regulator_enable(adc->reg);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> -
> - mutex_init(&adc->lock);
> -
> - ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&spi->dev, adc128_disable_regulator, adc->reg);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_disable_regulator;
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -err_disable_regulator:
> - regulator_disable(adc->reg);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static int adc128_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> -{
> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> - struct adc128 *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + return ret;
>
> - iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> - regulator_disable(adc->reg);
> + mutex_init(&adc->lock);
>
> - return 0;
> + return devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id adc128_of_match[] = {
> @@ -231,7 +220,6 @@ static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
> .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
> },
> .probe = adc128_probe,
> - .remove = adc128_remove,
> .id_table = adc128_id,
> };
> module_spi_driver(adc128_driver);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists