[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210825100500.GC24546@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:05:01 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] arm64: PCI: Introduce pcibios_free_irq()
helper function
[+Lorenzo]
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 03:16:12PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> Introduce pcibios_free_irq() to free irq in pci_device_probe() and
> pci_device_remove() that in drivers/pci/pci-driver.c.
Please can you describe the problem you're solving?
> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 1006ed2d7c60..40da5aff4548 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,18 @@
> int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> if (!acpi_disabled)
> - acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
> + return acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
This means we'll now fail device probe if we can't enable the GSI. Is that a
problem?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists