[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210825115332.GA4645@lespinasse.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 04:53:32 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>, dbueso@...e.de,
mingo@...nel.org, michel@...pinasse.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbtree: stop iteration early in rb_find_first
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 01:39:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:59:48PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> > stop iteration if match is not NULL and result of cmp is
> > not zero, this means the matched node has been found, and
> > the node with same key has been passed
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/rbtree.h | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree.h b/include/linux/rbtree.h
> > index d31ecaf4fdd3..2689771df9bb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rbtree.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rbtree.h
> > @@ -324,6 +324,9 @@ rb_find_first(const void *key, const struct rb_root *tree,
> > } else if (c > 0) {
> > node = node->rb_right;
> > }
> > +
> > + if (match && c)
> > + break;
> > }
> >
> > return match;
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
NAK. This looked slightly wrong before, and is more wrong after.
Before:
there was this weird condition if (c <= 0) {} else if (c > 0) {} ,
making you wonder what the third possibility may be. Easy fix would be
to remove the second condition.
After:
say the key is equal the root, so the code sets match=root and goes left.
Then it stops searching because match is set and c<0.
This doesn't work, the code needs to keep searching for the leftmost match.
--
Michel "walken" Lespinasse
Powered by blists - more mailing lists