linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] objtool: Introduce CFI hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:49:17 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, x86@...nel.org,
        mbenes@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        elver@...gle.com, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] objtool: Introduce CFI hash

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:27:55PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > +static struct cfi_state *cfi_alloc(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct cfi_state *cfi = calloc(sizeof(struct cfi_state), 1);
> > > +	if (!cfi) {
> > > +		WARN("calloc failed");
> > > +		exit(1);
> > > +	}
> > > +	nr_cfi++;
> > > +	init_cfi_state(cfi);
> > > +	return cfi;
> > > +}
> > 
> > I'm thinking this should also add it to the hash.  i.e. I don't think
> > there's a scenario where you'd alloc a cfi and not want to add it to the
> > hash.  The more sharing the better.
> 

> @@ -1666,9 +1666,8 @@ static int read_unwind_hints(struct objt
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		cfi = insn->cfip;
> -		if (!cfi)
> -			cfi = insn->cfip = cfi_alloc();

Urgh, the problem is that this runs before we allocate the hash-table!
Lemme try and re-order thing.