[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSZB0FB9YNd82bei@debian>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:12:48 +0100
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/98] 5.10.61-rc1 review
Hi Sasha,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:57:30PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.61 release.
> There are 98 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu 26 Aug 2021 04:58:25 PM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/56
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/57
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists