[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c982eea8-3b16-656b-dcb3-1b6e0d3e995d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:44:30 +0300
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
phil@...lpotter.co.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
straube.linux@...il.com, fmdefrancesco@...il.com,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] staging: r8188eu: add error handling of rtw_read8
On 8/25/21 4:34 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:02:26PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>> > This is not related to your patch. Ignore it.
>> >
>> >
>> > > > vim +2022 drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > 2020 case HW_VAR_BCN_VALID:
>> > > > 2021 /* BCN_VALID, BIT(16) of REG_TDECTRL = BIT(0) of REG_TDECTRL+2, write 1 to clear, Clear by sw */
>> > > > > 2022 u8 tmp;
>> > >
>> > > Hm, I don't know anything about ARM compilers, so should I wrap this code
>> > > block with {}?
>> >
>> > Yep.
>> >
>> > >
>> > > My local gcc 11.1.1 (x86_64) does not produce any warnings/errors
>> > >
>> >
>> > You should figure out whats up with that because it shouldn't compile
>> > with the gcc options that the kernel uses.
>> >
>>
>> AFAIK, at least 2 guys except me in this CC list compiled my series without
>> errors/warnings. Maybe, staging tree is missing some Makefile updates?
>>
>>
>> I'll resend series this evening anyway, but this is strange....
>
> Hm... In my version of GCC the error is:
>
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_halinit.c:1870:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
>
> That's a different error from what I was expecting. It's caused by
> having a declaration directly after a case statement. The warning that
> I was expecting was from -Wdeclaration-after-statement and it looks
> like this:
>
> warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
>
> You really should try investigate why this compiles for you because
> something is going wrong. It should not build without a warning.
>
Looks like it's bug in gcc 11.1.1. I've rebuilt this module with gcc 10
(gcc-10 (SUSE Linux) 10.3.1 20210707 [revision
048117e16c77f82598fca9af585500572d46ad73]) and build fails with error
described above
My default gcc is
gcc (SUSE Linux) 11.1.1 20210721 [revision
076930b9690ac3564638636f6b13bbb6bc608aea]
Any idea? :)
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists