[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D7EECF81-A701-4579-9775-481BB88F6D54@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:36:08 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Macieira, Thiago" <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 15/28] x86/arch_prctl: Create
ARCH_SET_STATE_ENABLE/ARCH_GET_STATE_ENABLE
On Aug 25, 2021, at 08:54, Bae, Chang Seok <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
>
> + /*
> + * @state_perm:
> + *
> + * This bitmap indicates the permission for dynamic state
> + * components, which should be the same in a process.
Sorry, with my last minute changes, the text needs update. At least,
s/, which should be the same in a process//
> + *
> + * Always reference group_leader's value via
> + * get_group_dynamic_state_perm() as it readily represents the
> + * process's state permission.
> + */
> + u64 dynamic_state_perm;
Thanks,
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists