[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b80a91db-cb35-ba6d-ab36-a0fa1ca051e7@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:19:25 +0800
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
"Alexander Shishkin (hwtracing + intel_th + stm + R:perf)"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: VMX: RTIT_CTL_BRANCH_EN has no dependency on
other CPUID bit
On 8/25/2021 11:30 AM, Like Xu wrote:
> +Alexander
>
> On 24/8/2021 7:07 pm, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> Per Intel SDM, RTIT_CTL_BRANCH_EN bit has no dependency on any CPUID
>> leaf 0x14.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 7ed96c460661..4a70a6d2f442 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -7116,7 +7116,8 @@ static void update_intel_pt_cfg(struct kvm_vcpu
>> *vcpu)
>> /* Initialize and clear the no dependency bits */
>> vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask = ~(RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN | RTIT_CTL_OS |
>> - RTIT_CTL_USR | RTIT_CTL_TSC_EN | RTIT_CTL_DISRETC);
>> + RTIT_CTL_USR | RTIT_CTL_TSC_EN | RTIT_CTL_DISRETC |
>> + RTIT_CTL_BRANCH_EN);
>> /*
>> * If CPUID.(EAX=14H,ECX=0):EBX[0]=1 CR3Filter can be set otherwise
>> @@ -7134,12 +7135,11 @@ static void update_intel_pt_cfg(struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> RTIT_CTL_CYC_THRESH | RTIT_CTL_PSB_FREQ);
>> /*
>> - * If CPUID.(EAX=14H,ECX=0):EBX[3]=1 MTCEn BranchEn and
>> - * MTCFreq can be set
>> + * If CPUID.(EAX=14H,ECX=0):EBX[3]=1 MTCEn and MTCFreq can be set
>
> If CPUID.(EAX=14H,ECX=0):EBX[3]=1,
>
> "indicates support of MTC timing packet and suppression of
> COFI-based packets."
I think it's a mistake of SDM in CPUID instruction.
If you read 31.3.1, table 31-11 of SDM 325462-075US,
It just says CPUID(0x14, 0):EBX[3]: MTC supprted.
It doesn't talk anything about COFI packets suppression.
Further as below.
> Per 31.2.5.4 Branch Enable (BranchEn),
>
> "If BranchEn is not set, then relevant COFI packets (TNT, TIP*,
> FUP, MODE.*) are suppressed."
>
> I think if the COFI capability is suppressed, the software can't set the
> BranchEn bit, right ?
Based on your understanding, isn't it that
1. if CPUID.(EAX=14H,ECX=0):EBX[3]=0, it doesn't support "suppression of
COFI-based packets".
2. if it doesn't support "suppression of COFI-based packets", then it
doens't support "If BranchEn is not set, then relevant COFI packets
(TNT, TIP*, FUP, MODE.*) are suppressed", i.e. BranchEn must be 1.
Anyway, I think it's just a mistake on CPUID instruction document of SDM.
CPUD.(EAX=14H,ECX=0):EBX[3] should only indicates the MTC support.
BranchEn should be always supported if PT is available. Per "31.2.7.2
IA32_RTIT_CTL MSR" on SDM:
When BranchEn is 1, it enables COFI-based packets.
When BranchEn is 0, it disables COFI-based packtes. i.e., COFI packets
are suppressed.
>> */
>> if (intel_pt_validate_cap(vmx->pt_desc.caps, PT_CAP_mtc))
>> vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask &= ~(RTIT_CTL_MTC_EN |
>> - RTIT_CTL_BRANCH_EN | RTIT_CTL_MTC_RANGE);
>> + RTIT_CTL_MTC_RANGE);
>> /* If CPUID.(EAX=14H,ECX=0):EBX[4]=1 FUPonPTW and PTWEn can be
>> set */
>> if (intel_pt_validate_cap(vmx->pt_desc.caps, PT_CAP_ptwrite))
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists